AI governance · Evidence readiness
EU AI Act Readiness: Prepare the Evidence Basis for Qualified Review
Bring the relevant requirements, responsibilities, controls and evidence into one reviewable basis before qualified legal or governance assessment.
Start with the review question
Readiness begins with a defined AI use case and a concrete review question. Applicable scope and source authority remain matters for the responsible legal and governance process.
Connect requirements to sources
Keep relevant requirements connected to their sources and versions. This separates the supplied source basis from later interpretation and helps reviewers see which material supports each question.
Separate controls from evidence
A documented control describes intended practice. Operating evidence is a separate input. WikiSure keeps those states distinguishable so a policy statement is not silently promoted into proof that a control operated.
Surface gaps, conflicts and ownership
Missing support becomes an explicit evidence gap. Contradictory source material remains an evidence conflict. Open items should retain visible ownership instead of disappearing into a narrative summary.
Hand the basis to accountable review
The result is not an automated compliance verdict. It is a structured handover of the evidence basis, open review items and unresolved questions to the people responsible for professional judgment and decisions.
Explore the workflow
See how an AI implementation review can move from sources to gaps and conflicts and then to human review.